Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 à 20:30 +0200, Sven Arvidsson a écrit : > Hi, > > I have been doing some bug triage for a few of the debian gnome > packages. I'm planning to do some more, but before I start there are a > few questions I'd like to get your input on. First, thanks for your work. Bug triage is a never-ending task, and help is much appreciated. > * What do I do about bugs open against versions in Sarge, but fixed in > Sid? AFAIK, packages in Sarge won't get updated, save for security > patches? > For example: 383566. You should mark them as closed with the sid version (or with the first version that fixes the bug if you know it). They will still appear in the BTS as being valid for sarge, but they should be closed anyway, as the fix can't go into sarge. > * Is it okay to close a bug I can't reproduce, where there have been new > releases of the package and the submitter have failed to respond to any > queries? If so, how long should I wait? > For example: 294503, last attempt to contact submitter was more than a > year ago. 351676, no reply after about three months. I generally consider > 1 month without a reply to be enough. Depending on the bug (e.g. if it needs complex action on the user's side), I can wait for 3-4 months. > * What do I do about bugs open against packages in woody? > For example: 306321 and 280680, are upgrades from woody supported any > longer? As upgrades from woody need to go through sarge, they won't be fixed. Bug #280680 looks like a user error anyway (locally installed freetype library). > BTW, the debian-women BTS Cleanup HOWTO did answer a lot of my other > questions. Maybe it should be moved to the Debian Wiki? > http://lists.debian.org/debian-women/2006/04/msg00005.html This is definitely a good idea. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=