Re: Patch to add DirectFB backend to current GTK+ sources

["Eddy Petrişor" <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>]

On 5/22/06, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:58:22PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > On 5/22/06, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> > >> Having GTKDFB 2.8.17, whose DFB backend is much more stable than the old
> > >> one found in GTKDFB 2.0.9, available as udeb may allow Etch to be
> > >> released with graphical frontend enabled by default ?
> > >
> > >I am not sure, i got the impression that the default choice was not due to
> > >this consideration, but more about the general maturity of it.
> >
> > I think that is not the case, iirc, the 2.8 was preffered for the
> > exact reason of not having to maintain two gtk trees. Every arch
> > except hurd has libgtk2.0-0 at 2.8.17 while 2.8.16 has migrated in
> > testing:
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/libs/libgtk2.0-0
>
> Sure, but this  is a gtk/gnome choice, i was refering to the d-i choice here.

I thought that was the reasoning behind
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/05/msg00675.html, wasn't it?

--
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein