Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)

> If we are going to ship GNOME 2.16 in etch

Are we?

-- 
Ondrej Sury <ondrej@sury.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to:

References:
- gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>