Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)

To: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
From: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:58:52 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1147769933.5821.13.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060516082327.GB19405@powerlinux.fr>
References: <1147679595.7496.9.camel@localhost> <4468B4B2.4090700@tiscali.it> <20060515214015.GE2909@powerlinux.fr> <200605160734.27528.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 20060516070946.GF18668@powerlinux.fr> <[🔎] 1147765056.5821.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 20060516075006.GA21505@powerlinux.fr> <[🔎] 1147766866.5821.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 20060516082327.GB19405@powerlinux.fr>

Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 10:23 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :

> Ok, but if someone else would be packaging those to produce .udebs, you have
> no particular objection to uploading .debs to experimental at the same time ? 

Are you saying you want to hijack GTK now? 


Sebastien Bacher

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

References:
- gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
Next by Date: Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
Previous by thread: Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
Next by thread: Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread