Re: Shipping static libraries
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:50:28AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Do you really think this is worse than X shipping static libraries ? I mean
> > building X already used to need many GB of free disk space, and i have some
> > doubts that gtk+ will be more disk-space hungry, but i could be wrong.
> Yes, gtk needs more space than xorg. Have a look at:
Well, not much more though, and i remember older X builds which needed well
over 2GB (i think XFree86 needed 4GB or so back in those days, where i still
had my apus amiga).