Re: Shipping static libraries
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> Do you really think this is worse than X shipping static libraries ? I mean
> building X already used to need many GB of free disk space, and i have some
> doubts that gtk+ will be more disk-space hungry, but i could be wrong.
Yes, gtk needs more space than xorg. Have a look at:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gtk%2B2.0&ver=2.6.2-1&arch=m68k&stamp=1107973275&file=log&as=raw
(2451432k)
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=xorg-x11&ver=6.8.2.dfsg.1-9&arch=m68k&stamp=1129641779&file=log&as=raw
(1660956k)
--
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
"What do we want? BRAINS! When do we want it? BRAINS!"
Reply to: