On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 23:24 +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote: > Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr> writes: > > > I don't care how slow gnucash development is. If 10000 packages made > > the switch from GNOME 1 to GNOME 2 _except_ gnucash, then to the hell > > with it. You're saying I'm insensible with the gnucash developers and > > their pace of development, why don't you simply say I'm the one putting > > the knife under gnucash's throat and I can decide life or death of a > > project? > > What about users who *depend* on gnucash for their work? I'm, > accidently, one of them. I use gnucash for the accounting in my work > and I can't see any alternative to it, no matter how obsolete GNOME 1 > is. Please note, that we are not trying to drop gnucash from STABLE Debian release. But it seems to be reasonable for me to exclude gnome1 stuff from etch. You can always use D-I-Y method if you want to use gnome1+gnucash. Or stay with sarge where gnucash is and will be included. Ondrej. -- Ondrej Sury <ondrej@sury.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part