On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 04:49, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Oh, I see. But maybe it's a bit overkill: wouldn't it be simpler to just > use the periodic cleanup function which is already run every 30s? > Compared with the time an upgrade generally takes, waiting for at most > 30s for the new schemas to be available would be enough. That sounds fine to me. Havoc