RE: New dependences in gnome-core, might be better in gnome?
> From: Jeff Waugh [mailto:jdub@perkypants.org]
> The 'gnome' meta package has many, many, many additional
> packages than what upstream calls the 'GNOME Desktop'
> release. And so it should!
[snip]
> The 'gnome' meta package does not represent the 'GNOME
> Desktop' release.
Is there any meta package that does represent the GNOME Desktop release? Am
I the only one that thinks that such a thing might be useful? What is the
reasoning for including extra applications in something called "GNOME
Desktop". Notice that I am not challenging that, I am simply asking.
What happened to the Debian Desktop project that I heard about a while ago?
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc@usa.net
Reply to: