Re: Arrgh! Nautilus stalled again?!?

To: Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@gmx.de>
Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Arrgh! Nautilus stalled again?!?
From: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:35:18 +0200
Message-id: <87ismv28yx.fsf@seb128.wanadoo.fr>
In-reply-to: <8765iwf0ya.fsf@rudi.3linden.net> (Johannes Rohr's message of "Sat, 11 Oct 2003 13:50:05 +0200")
References: <8765iwf0ya.fsf@rudi.3linden.net>

Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@gmx.de> writes:

> manually overrides these conflicts? Rubrica is pretty much alpha
> quality software. Temporary removing it from testing should be an
> acceptable choice!

I disagree with the alpha part, but rubrica testing removal has been
asked 3 days ago to avoid this blockage.

> For libxslt1-python2.2 I read:
>
> libxslt1-python2.2  is confusing ( in unstable, 1.0.30-3 in testing)

I don't know for thus part ..

Cheers,

Sebastien Bacher

Reply to:

References:
- Arrgh! Nautilus stalled again?!?
  - From: Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: Arrgh! Nautilus stalled again?!?
Next by Date: unsubscribe
Previous by thread: Arrgh! Nautilus stalled again?!?
Next by thread: Re: Arrgh! Nautilus stalled again?!?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread