Re: please NMU gal2
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:35:20PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> christophe barbe <christophe@cattlegrid.net> writes:
>
> > I am not criticizing the gnome 2.4 effort at all. It's just that being
> > unable to use nautilus (which despite being still there doesn't work
> > well with a partial upgrade to g2.4) is what I call broken.
>
> $ apt-cache showsrc nautilus | grep gal
> $
>
> $ apt-cache show nautilus | grep gal
> $
>
> Nautilus doesn't depends on gal2, and built fine on 9 archs ... so
> saying that gnome is broken on all archs is rude.
You seems to take it personnaly so I am sorry. I guess it's the word
broken that you don't like. Nautilus is not the broken package anyway.
It's the one I have on my system that is not playing nicely with the
gnome libs I have. I can't install the current nautilus (which would
work fine I am sure) without loosing a lot of gnome apps that I need.
I believe the culprit was gal2 and thanks to you the situation should
improve now.
Question: is it possible to indicate to the buildd servers that they
could retry to build some packages as soon as the new gal2 is available
(gtkhml3, evolution, ...)?
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé <christophe.barbe@ufies.org>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E
As every cat owner knows, nobody owns a cat.
--Ellen Perry Berkeley
Reply to: