Re: please NMU gal2
christophe barbe <christophe@cattlegrid.net> writes:
> I am not criticizing the gnome 2.4 effort at all. It's just that being
> unable to use nautilus (which despite being still there doesn't work
> well with a partial upgrade to g2.4) is what I call broken.
$ apt-cache showsrc nautilus | grep gal
$
$ apt-cache show nautilus | grep gal
$
Nautilus doesn't depends on gal2, and built fine on 9 archs ... so
saying that gnome is broken on all archs is rude.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Reply to: