Le ven 08/08/2003 à 12:15, Sven Luther a écrit : > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 08:32:42AM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > [...] > > > > > In truth, we would need a group of smaller experimental repositories, > > > with autobuilders attached too. > > Could there be one for backports to Woody as someone proponed a few days > > ago? > > What you need official woody backports, and that is something i think > would be good to have, but i am not the one to decide about that, and i > am not sure our current infrastructure can handle it. It is ready for > it, but if you consider the considerable amount of network space and bandwith > as well as the load on the autobuilders, i am not sure it would be > realsitically doable. Well, I was not thinking really about an official buildd, but a machine where to compile automatically for a small team to work on it together. I'm not, in any way, willing to delay or slow down the Sarge release. The opposite, in fact, if I can do anything to get the patches or solutions I found to backport to Woody available to Sarge, I would be really glad. Maybe some buildd guru could help me setup such a system? I have already a machine that could be used to this (with plenty of disk space and horsepower), but I have to be carefull because it's already a production machine. I would like at least to talk to someone knowledgeable in this respect before doing it actually. > Also, such a project would be better discussed in a post sarge release > timeframe, in order not to delay the sarge release further than is > necessary. Then I would have to do it for Sarge, not Woody. But who knows when Sarge will be out? I need a cool desktop right now, not somewhere end of this year (or is it next year ;-)). > Friendly, > > Sven Luther -- Jérôme Warnier <jwarnier@beeznest.net> BeezNest s.à r.l.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=