Re: What's up on arm? (/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `XineramaIsActive')

To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: What's up on arm? (/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `XineramaIsActive')
From: Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:59:00 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 874r1l71ij.fsf@falcon.wanadoo.fr>
Mail-followup-to: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Reply-to: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87wuehe3r4.fsf@comlink.apc.org> (Johannes Rohr's message of "Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:28:47 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 87wuehe3r4.fsf@comlink.apc.org>

Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@gmx.de> writes:

> Hi,

Hi,

[...]

> Are there known issues with Xinerama on arm? Is there a workaround for
> Gnome packages, like e.g. disabling Xinerama support on arm?

Nothing related to Gnome but the guilty is GTK 2.0

,----
| gtk+2.0 (2.2.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
| 
|   * debian/control:
|     - changed a section for libgtk2.0-dbg to libdevel.
|   * debian/patches/000_gtk+-debian-aclocal.patch:
|     - applied to fix Xinerama library linkage broken on arm and m68k.
|       (closes: Bug#190569)
|       Thanks to James Troup and Phil Blundell.
| 
|  -- Akira TAGOH <tagoh@debian.org>  Sat,  3 May 2003 01:50:52 +0900
`----

Wrong patch ?

Christian

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's up on arm? (/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `XineramaIsActive')
  - From: Akira TAGOH <tagoh@debian.org>

References:
- What's up on arm? (/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `XineramaIsActive')
  - From: Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: Re: new file open dialog
Next by Date: Re: What's up on arm? (/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `XineramaIsActive')
Previous by thread: What's up on arm? (/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `XineramaIsActive')
Next by thread: Re: What's up on arm? (/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `XineramaIsActive')
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread