Re: GNOME 2.2 summary 22/06/2003
- To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.2 summary 22/06/2003
- From: Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 22:04:11 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87r85kr26c.fsf@comlink.apc.org>
- In-reply-to: <1vEB.7Th.13@gated-at.bofh.it> (Christian Marillat's message of "Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:20:09 +0200")
- References: <1kg8.6k6.9@gated-at.bofh.it> <1vlp.7Bm.17@gated-at.bofh.it> <1vEB.7Th.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr> writes:
[...]
>> At least #180063 is a real security hole that probably takes a fair
>> amount of hacking to get fixed.
>
> Then I'll remove the xscreensaver-gnome suggests. I don't see a good
> reason to keep that. Another advice ?
[...]
If the RC bugs in xscreensaver aren't fixable for the moment, an
option would be to have the old package (4.0.5-9) removed from
testing. This would unstall gnome-control-center while giving the
xscreensaver maintainer the time to fix those bugs.
Or you could request the old control-center and libcapplet0 to be
purged from testing.
Just my 2 €-cent
Thanks,
Johannes
Reply to: