Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 03:44, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Done #177524
Great, thanks. I've just uploaded a new meta-gnome2 package with the
changes discussed earlier; according to the ftpmasters, its gnome-core
will simply replace the one in unstable.
Reply to:
- References:
- Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Ross Burton <ross@burtonini.com>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Joe Drew <hoserhead@woot.net>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Joe Drew <hoserhead@woot.net>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr>