Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we

To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we
From: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 08:54:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 200208081254.IAA07409@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>

   Well I rebuilt almost all of my currently installed
GNOME 2.0.0 packages last night without much problem.
However in rebuild xchat-1.9.2, I discovered that we
need to do something about gdk-imlib1. This is currently
linked to png2-dev and libglib/gtk 1.2. Are we going
to have a png3/glib2.0/gtk+2.0 version of imlib built?
                            Jack

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we
  - From: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>

Prev by Date: Re: gnome-media2 accepted into experimental
Next by Date: Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we
Previous by thread: Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we
Next by thread: Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread