[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Gnome 2 summary 20/01/2002 (2)



On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 15:58, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >> "DP" == Davide Puricelli <evo@debian.org> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 06:38:34PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >> Hi again,
> 
> > [snip]
> 
> >> eog-0.109.1                     0.6.6 Bug "Please consider to package eog 2"
> > ^^^^
> 
> > Before starting packaging it, I'd like to receive some info:
> 
> > 1)Should I call it eog2 and keep eog package or just go ahead with eog
> > package?
> 
> Should be called eog2, and don't forget to rename the tarball too.
> 
> > 2)What I need now to compile my gnome packages? I mean, what new
> > packages should I install?
> 
> Try a debuild :-)
> 
> We have the following package :
> 
> libart-2.0-dev
> libgnome2-dev
> libgnomeui-dev
> libglade2-dev
> libgnomeprint2-dev
> libgnomeprintui-dev
> libgnomevfs2-dev
> 
> I'll add a task for Gnome 2 devel in the tasksel package this week.
> 
> > 3)Can I upload to unstable or experimental is better?
> 
> experimental is better, we will move all the Gnome 2 package in sid
> later (ie: when Gnome 2 will be more stable).

Where can I get the experimental packages ? I had to go and hunt in the
pool to get everything up to lignomeui2-dev.

Cheers

-- 
/Bastien Nocera
http://hadess.net

Attachment: pgpfgJZGEWWtm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: