[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gdm is old.



I use to get gdm from there:
   
   http://files.hadess.net/debian/

I don't see a good reason to keep gdm1. I remember that before gnome2
hits sid, the excuse was that gnome2 was not in sid. Now it's just a
package that need to be adopted (read hijacked) IMHO.

It would not be funny to see the next release with gnome2 and gdm1. 

Christophe

On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 05:53:24PM -0330, Ian Penney wrote:
> 
> Downloaded from http://files.hadess.net/debian/
> gdm2_2.4.0.11-1.diff.gz
> gdm2_2.4.0.11-1.dsc
> gdm2_2.4.0.11.orig.tar.gz
> 
> Patched the original source.
> Tried to compile it...
> Realized I'd need some library -dev packages, apt-get install'ed them.
>        Added the following lines to vicious-extensions/ve-misc.c, 
> because it wouldn't compile.
>                #include <langinfo.h>
>                #include <locale.h>
>        chmod 755 debian/rules
> run dpkg-buildpackage
> Uninstall gdm if you've got it.
> dpkg --purge gdm, make sure all the crap is out.
> dpkg --install ./gdm2_2.4.0.11-1_i386.deb
> I found that the /var/lib/dpkg/info/gdm.prerm script referred to 
> /etc/init.d/gdm2, instead of /etc/init.d/gdm, fixed that.
> Found that libpam was having a little problem..
>        Downgraded to libpam-modules and libpam0g 0.72-35.
> Ran up gdm2 and gave it a nice looking theme from art.gnome.org using 
> gdmconf!
> 
> I sure hope this helps somebody out! I spent the majority of a sunday 
> afternoon at this, neglecting a Computer Science assignment on hashing.
> 
> This isn't a flawless solution, but I hope some users can make use of it 
> until Ryan gets around to packaging gdm2 properly.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
> listmaster@lists.debian.org

-- 
Christophe Barbé <christophe.barbe@ufies.org>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8  F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E

A qui sait comprendre, peu de mots suffisent.
(Intelligenti pauca.) 



Reply to: