[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

nautilus2 crashes on Sparc when drawing the desktop



Hi guys,

I just upgraded my Sparc box to Gnome 2 (which I had been to hit
unstable). The upgrade went well, but Nautilus is giving me a hard
time. As soon as I start it it crashes. I managed to change a
preference so it doesn't draw the desktop and in that case it doesn't
crash. But it's not nice to not have a desktop so I'd like to figure out
what is going on.

A stack trace doesn't reveal anything suspicious, at least to me. I am
attaching the trace below.

Is anyone out there running Nautilus 2 on a Sparc?

Thanks!

Eloy.-

----------------

#0  0x7104df50 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x7104df24 in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x70dd9970 in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#3  0x702fb158 in libgnomeui_module_info_get () from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#4  0x70dd8194 in pthread_sighandler () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#5  0x70fd2f64 in sigaction () from /lib/libc.so.6
#6  0x700bb850 in nautilus_icon_container_update_scroll_region ()
   from /usr/lib/libnautilus-private.so.2
#7  0x700bb8dc in nautilus_icon_container_update_scroll_region ()
   from /usr/lib/libnautilus-private.so.2
#8  0x700c0e08 in nautilus_icon_container_update_icon ()
   from /usr/lib/libnautilus-private.so.2
#9  0x700bb930 in nautilus_icon_container_update_scroll_region ()
   from /usr/lib/libnautilus-private.so.2
#10 0x700bb9bc in nautilus_icon_container_update_scroll_region ()
   from /usr/lib/libnautilus-private.so.2
#11 0x70e22098 in g_timeout_add () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#12 0x70e1ed80 in g_get_current_time () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#13 0x70e1ff84 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#14 0x70e203d8 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#15 0x70e20d88 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib
#16 0x70610a6c in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 0x0002d4f4 in _init ()
#18 0x70fbf438 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6



Reply to: