[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GNOME2 again (Re: Debian Weekly News - September 17th, 2002)



On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:55:36AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Sven LUTHER">
> 
> > Just a stupid question, but why not add a *1 suffix to all old gnome1
> > package, this way we could have gnome2 as default, and people still
> > needing gnome1 would use the *1 packages ?
> 
> Mostly because the idea is to *not* have the GNOME 2.x Desktop stuff
> replace the 1.x stuff by default. That's quite the point. :-)

If that were true, what is the reason for not putting gnome2 packages in
unstable ? 

Notice that the RM said he would want to release sarge quickly (but then
we have been saying that before every previous release, and it never
happened) and that sarge would include gnome2.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: