[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Gnome2 for woody



On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 12:35:45PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> > > Unstable will have Gnome2 and won't have 1.4.
> > 
> > That's a great goal, but to do that effectively (and without a lot of
> > user dissent) the transition has to be well planned and well executed.
> 
> Unstable isn't for users. Period. By the time sarge releases we *will*
> have a transition between gnome 1.4->gnome 2 (via Ximian and Red Hat);
> until then, things can remain as they are.

This is the most ass-backwards thing I've read on this list yet.  You know
just as well as I do that users _do_ use sid.  And if they don't, they'll
at least use sarge.  At this point, sarge can be expected to have Gnome2
packages trickle in as has happened with unstable, especially since the
bugs about what the Gnome2 packages break for a Gnome1 user are not
allowed to remain open.

No, this isn't going to work.  A little more care is needed.  It's sad
(yet quite typical, I'm sorry to say) that Debian quality is suffering
because a few people don't see that.

-- 
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net>         We can hope for the future
                                                But there might not be one
 
* knghtbrd is gone - zzz - messages will be snapped like wet towels at all
  of the people who have stolen the trademark knghtbrd away message
<Coderjoe> ack
* Coderjoe prepares to defend himself from wet messages

Attachment: pgpohlTQ_UH25.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: