On Fri, 2002-07-19 at 02:53, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > Em 19 Jul 2002 01:49:17 +0100, Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> escreveu: > > > > Sure, someone spot the same error on debian-user-portuguese. The problem > > > here is that I have openoffice.org installed and thus libgcc > 1:3.1. > > > The solution to the problem will be to backport that lib, also... do > > > you think that'll cause any problem? > > > > Given how big gcc is, it would probably be easier to simply use gcc > > 2.95.4, and not require any libgcc. > > Hmmm... I had not realized gconf2 was using gcc3... (dumb me), any > specific reason for that? I'll accept your suggestion if 'no' is > the answer. 'no' You probably compiled gconf using gcc3. I see that as the only explanation as it doesn't build-dep on gcc3, or try to use it at compile-time. -- /Bastien Nocera http://hadess.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part