[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Gnome 2 summary 27/06/2002



Joseph Carter wrote:
This is somewhat off-topic, but sawfish2 is NOT a safe thing to upgrade to. A lot of features have been deprecated, like viewports, that a lot of people use.

Hmm, the difference between a workspace and a viewport, as implemented in
sawfish, is that one has windows overlapping from one viewport to the
next, while the other requires windows to be on a specific workspace.

One is useful, the other is useful.  Both together are not useful.
Solution?  Call them both workspaces for the sake of documentation sanity
and if any preference must exist, have it be whether or not windows are
kept on a single workspace only or not.

This seems to be Havoc's opinion of how it should be handled in Metacity
based on a discussion I had with him about the very feature after someone
on irc asked him about viewports.  It applies to sawfish equally well,
IMO.

I'm not arguing about the theory of behind it -- that discussion has flooded way too many mailing lists already... let's try to leave it out of this one.

Sawfish doesn't implement a way to make workspaces work like viewports yet. When a viewport user upgrades to sawfish2, all her viewports disappear, and she has to hack lisp in order to use them again. That's not very fun (unless you've got a lot of free time and like hacking lisp). Therefore, I wouldn't call sawfish2 a save thing to upgrade. Similar things happen with other features as well.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: