Re: GNOME-2 transition: a first complaint
- To: Debian-GTK-Gnome <debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME-2 transition: a first complaint
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:50:35 +1000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20020701055035.GA1573@perkypants.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Debian-GTK-Gnome <debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20020630135646.GA1609@thanes.org>
- References: <20020629115430.GB1741@bluecherry.net> <20020629124351.GB1567@thanes.org> <878z4yp5tv.fsf@falcon.wanadoo.fr> <20020629142143.GC1567@thanes.org> <873cv6cdkm.fsf@falcon.wanadoo.fr> <20020629154748.GF1567@thanes.org> <20020629160210.GJ5432@perkypants.org> <20020629161730.GG1567@thanes.org> <1025406654.11385.1310.camel@dozo> <20020630135646.GA1609@thanes.org>
<quote who="Marek Habersack">
> It's on _choice_. The beauty of GNOME has always been in the possibility
> to make choices - unlike with KDE or Windows where you have virtually no
> choice.
That's not true. See the abundance of "choice" in KDE 3.0.1 - there are far
more options, tweaks, settings and preferences than any administrator or
user would want to become familar with. If you want a hideous amount of
unnecessary choice, you might want to look at KDE again.
(This particular issue - opaque move/resize - is a tough one. It would be
inane to suggest that GNOME could/should target users of 486/P1 class
machines, but we're not always given the luxury of good video cards and X
drivers. My personal take on this is that less demanding methods will make
their way back into Metacity. But only due to a very serious need, not just
because random technologists like a lot of esoteric options.)
- Jeff
--
"If you want to start a debate on a subject, however, all that seems to
be necessary is to involve perennial target Richard Gooch." - LWN
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: