On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:30:15PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > file-roller2 depends on nautilus1.1 which isn't in unstable. That's why > > it's in experimental. > > Ah. Well, I've personally been happy with nautilus1.1. Nautilus 1.0 is > far too slow for my limited patience... > > So maybe we could just stick nautilus1.1 in unstable. That's a > judgement call on the part of the nautilus1.1 maintainer; what do you > think, Takuo? I'm certainly agreeable to this. Nautilus has probably been one of the most stable parts of Gnome2 I've used. Of course, the current revision (which I just installed today) seems to have forgotten to read my desktop font from gconfd, but I'm not sure what's up there. Others are seeing the same problem, so I wonder... This problem seems unreproducable by those who need to produce it though, which is annoying. The notion that it is in fact using the font I told it to has been raised, but I dismiss that as bull given that Verdana is not a serif font, and I'd use nothing else for a small eye-friendly proportional font. =p -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net> Don't feed the sigs * bma is a yank * Knghtbrd is a Knghtbrd * dhd is also a yank * Espy is evil * Knghtbrd believes Espy
Attachment:
pgpQ5Dfng7S2T.pgp
Description: PGP signature