Re: dhelp exposure
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 08:18:19PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Of course, all of this would require that the packages in question
> depend on dhelp
As a dwww user, I can't say I'm thrilled with that suggestion! :-)
I'd rather see the packages in question depend on doc-base (which in
turn depends on dhelp|dwww), and have the packages in question use
whichever of dhelp or dwww is installed (or even both if both are).
Might be a little more work, but it'd be well worth it in my opinion.
That's the whole reason behind having doc-base, as far as I can see.
Don't *make* me release a version of orbit that Depends: dwww,
Conflicts: dhelp! :-)
cheers
--
Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long
xtifr@debian.org | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single
or xtifr@dsp.net | volcaniconi- standalone haiku
Reply to: