Re: golang-golang-x-oauth2 update
On 21/08/25 12:48 am, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On 20/08/25 4:41 pm, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Hi. I have uploaded 0.30.0-1 to experimental, but the amount of reverse
>> build dependencies (~300?) scare me. Could anyone who knows this
>> package look into if 0.30.0-1 would be fine for unstable? No urgency,
>> I'm working on packages for NEW that may end up needing this, but having
>> it in experimental is fine.
>
> You can consider to check britney pseudo excuses for your package:
> https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html
>
> It will give you some fair idea of what reverse-depends need fixing.
> This will however give the full picture about reverse-build-depends, i.e.
> if something FTBFS because of this package and is not relying on it
> during autopkgtests.
s/however/however NOT/
Reply to: