Re: golang-golang-x-oauth2 update
On 20/08/25 4:41 pm, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Hi. I have uploaded 0.30.0-1 to experimental, but the amount of reverse
> build dependencies (~300?) scare me. Could anyone who knows this
> package look into if 0.30.0-1 would be fine for unstable? No urgency,
> I'm working on packages for NEW that may end up needing this, but having
> it in experimental is fine.
You can consider to check britney pseudo excuses for your package:
https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html
It will give you some fair idea of what reverse-depends need fixing.
This will however give the full picture about reverse-build-depends, i.e.
if something FTBFS because of this package and is not relying on it
during autopkgtests.
On 21/08/25 12:15 am, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Le mer. 20 août 2025 à 20:32, Félix Sipma <felix@debian.org> a écrit :
>> Maybe recursively building all the reverse-dependencies could be a nice
>> job for debusine?
There already is an issue filed for it https://salsa.debian.org/freexian-team/debusine/-/issues/772
> Alternatively, I've just tried to apply this:
> https://salsa.debian.org/aquilamacedo/rocksdb/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/salsa-ci.yml?ref_type=heads
>
> to libuv1, and it gives
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libuv1/-/pipelines/913618
This is super cool, but IIRC salsa admins are not very happy with running jobs like these
which will re-build a lot of packages, as it can overwhelm the runners. I'd ask them once before
I do this :)
Best,
Nilesh
Reply to: