Mathias Gibbens <gibmat@debian.org> writes: > For each of those packages, I had recently switched the Built-Using > stanza to Static-Built-Using after seeing lintian emit a new message > about this[0]. The template used by dh-make-golang has also been > updated to use the Static-Built-Using field. I don't have an answer to your issue - but what is not clear to me is if we should remove the Built-Using: headers when adding Static-Built-Using? I get QA linter complaints when Built-Using: is missing, so for a small number of packages I just added Static-Built-Using: but maybe I should also remove Built-Using: and ignore the linter complaints? If the answer depends on exact package and situation, I'll try to bring it up next time this hits me... /Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature