[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Static-Built-Using and binNMUs?



Mathias Gibbens <gibmat@debian.org> writes:

>   For each of those packages, I had recently switched the Built-Using
> stanza to Static-Built-Using after seeing lintian emit a new message
> about this[0]. The template used by dh-make-golang has also been
> updated to use the Static-Built-Using field.

I don't have an answer to your issue - but what is not clear to me is if
we should remove the Built-Using: headers when adding
Static-Built-Using?  I get QA linter complaints when Built-Using: is
missing, so for a small number of packages I just added
Static-Built-Using: but maybe I should also remove Built-Using: and
ignore the linter complaints?

If the answer depends on exact package and situation, I'll try to bring
it up next time this hits me...

/Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: