Re: podman's debian/copyright

[Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de>]

I happen to know (because I occasionally attend the podman community meetings) that
podman is developed mostly by redhat employees.

What was the wording of the reject message. Maybe you can also attribute the copyright
to redhat, or simply the "oci-seccomp-bpf-hook developers"?

best,
-rt

On 8/22/22 12:16, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> Hi Reinhard and Dmitry,
>
>    I'm packaging oci-seccomp-bpf-hook but it got rightly rejected by
> ftp-masters because of incorrect debian/copyright. As result I opened an
> issue [0] with upstream so to have actually _some_ copyright statement to
> be included in the package.
>
> As part of that discussion, Podman was mentioned [1] and looking into it I
> noticed it's not in a situation much different from oci-seccomp-bpf-hook
> therefore I wanted to check here before opening any RC bug.
>
> How the following entry in debian/copyright could be determined?
>
>    Files: *
>    Copyright:
>        2016-2019 Red Hat, Inc.
>    License: Apache-2.0
>
> I fail to deduce it from any content of the source tree.
>
> Thanks,
> Dom
>
> [0] https://github.com/containers/oci-seccomp-bpf-hook/issues/99
> [1] https://github.com/containers/oci-seccomp-bpf-hook/issues/99#issuecomment-1222036689