On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 00:10 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 06:27:24PM +0000, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > then rebuilt each of the failed packages in a > > clean sbuild environment without the updated version of golang- > > golang- > > x-sys and found that 22 of those 25 still failed to build, due to > > various issues unrelated to updating golang-golang-x-sys (a brief > > listing of those failing packages is at the end of this message). > > If they are already FTBFS regardless of any changes in x-sys, then > you probably > should consider filing bug reports for these packages. I did notice some already had RC bugs about their FTBFS status; I'll go through and file bugs for any packages that don't have the problem reported yet. > > > Since it looks like updating golang-golang-x-sys will not > > introduce > > any new FTBFS errors in packages in main, could someone upload an > > updated version? > > I'm currently only a DM, and while I could prepare the > > update, I would then have to request sponsorship. Updating the > > package > > itself is pretty easy, so it might just be simpler for a DD on the > > team > > to do that directly. > > Could you consider prepping an update? > I know it is simple but I am a little swamped with real life these > days. I'll be happy > to sponsor. Thanks! I've pushed the update to the git repo, and it's ready for a `dch -r`, tag, and upload. (I hope I did that all correctly -- if not, let me know what I messed up!) > > > Packages that fail to build in unstable: > > > > Missing deps in unstable: gitaly > > Please build reverse-build the 'experimental version' of gitaly > (14.8.5+dfsg-1) with updated > x-sys since a FTBFS in gitaly means gitlab would be directly > affected. > CC'ing Praveen to keep in him loop. Well, the experimental version of gitaly isn't any worse with the updated version of golang-golang-x-sys.... it compiles fine, although the test suite is pretty ugly. I looked up the buildd logs for gitaly [1] and it seems that roughly the same tests are passing or failing in the same ways. Thanks, Mathias [1] -- https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gitaly&suite=experimental
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part