Re: [RFS] golang-github-newrelic-go-agent

[Peymaneh Nejad <p.nejad@posteo.de>]

Am 16.07.21 um 01:01 schrieb Peymaneh Nejad:
> Am 16.07.21 um 00:19 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> > On 7/16/21 3:02 AM, Peymaneh Nejad wrote:
> > > Am 15.07.21 um 22:21 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> > > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 01:45, Peymaneh Nejad <p.nejad@posteo.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This is package is needed for smallstep/certificates
> > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-newrelic-go-agent
> > > >
> > > > Can you fix this?
> > > >
> > > > $ origtargz
> > > > W: Unable to locate package golang-github-newrelic-go-agent
> > > > Trying uscan --download --download-current-version ...
> > > > uscan warn: In debian/watch no matching hrefs for version 3.13.0 in watch
> > > > line
> > > >     https://github.com/newrelic/go-agent/tags .*/v?(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz debian
> > > > Could not find any location for
> > > > golang-github-newrelic-go-agent_3.13.0.orig.tar.*
> > > >
> > > > I also do not see a 3.13.0 at https://github.com/newrelic/go-agent/tags
> > > I get the same error, even though the tag does exists:
> > > https://github.com/newrelic/go-agent/releases/tag/v3.13.0
> > >
> > > I think the problem is that uscan considers version tags for the integration 
> > > modules that look like this:
> > > "v3/integrations/nrgrpc/v1.3.0"
> > > as release tags for the whole repo and does not search further for a v3.13.0
> >
> >
> > This is *likely* worth a bug report against uscan. The regex is not wrong 
> > AFAICS -- not sure what stops it.
> Yes, this is in fact a bug with uscan. Apparently it does not go past the first 
> page on https://github.com/newrelic/go-agent/tags, which is full of the 
> integrations-tags
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950880
>
> > If you're able to figure this out -- fair. If not, you could consider to start 
> > following the pristine-tar layout and generate tars from that (like it is done 
> > for several teams)
> > This does not align with the go team policy though, but for not completely 
> > against it either.
I have changed the layout to pristine ta.
However, as the issue made me aware upstream released a new version (3.14.0) 
like ~4 days ago.
I assume you'd rather upload the most recent one; I will look into that next week

Peymaneh

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature