On 2019-01-09 6:54 a.m., Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Hi Juan,
> are you still working on this ITP? I was looking at skopeo as well,
> and stumpled upon this ITP. I noticed that you created a repository on
> This package never got uploaded.
> However, I also noticed that there is another packaging repo in salsa,
> which contains a similar package that did get uploaded:
> I wonder what the relationship between these two are. It seems that the
> version does declare it satisfies the import of the
> github:ostreedev/ostree-go repo,
> which makes me believe it is a fork.
Looking at the upstream website will show you that yes it is a fork.
(forked from ostreedev/ostree).
In file included from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/glist.h:32,from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/ghash.h:33,from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h:50,/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmem.h:121:18: warning: passing argument 1 of 'g_object_unref' discards 'volatile' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers](destroy) (_ptr); \^~~~/usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gobject.h:672:36: note: in expansion of macro 'g_clear_pointer'#define g_clear_object(object_ptr) g_clear_pointer ((object_ptr), g_object_unref)^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g_clear_object(object_ptr);
Temporary repository for patches not yet merged in upstream ostree-go. Please don't use this one but use https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree-go instead