[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#877434: Acknowledgement (glibc: [INTL:de] updated German man page translation)



On 2019-01-04 18:41, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Aurelien,
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 06:33:55PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2019-01-04 15:51, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > > Hello Aurelien,
> > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 08:17:38PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > On 2018-12-26 22:00, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > > > > Hello Glibc maintainers,
> > > > > more than one year ago I submitted the updated German man page
> > > > 
> > > > Sorry this has been missed, that will be in the next upload.
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > > > translation. As the freeze is approaching I (and probably other German
> > > > > speaking users) would be very happy if you could include it in your
> > > > > package so that it is part of the next stable release.
> > > > 
> > > > Note that your update only changes some fuzzy strings, so the German
> > > > translated files will be unchanged.
> > > 
> > > Fixing fuzzy strings (i.e. they are not fuzzy anymore) recompletes the
> > > German translation. I just checked, everything looks fine. Or are
> > 
> > My point is that while the fuzzy is removed from the po file, the
> > resulting German translation is unchanged as it was already correct.
> > Therefore there is no user visible changes.
> 
> Oh, I see what you mean. The change was a pure english one - it did
> not affect the translation. Therefore the correct action (which could
> have been done by you as maintainers as well) was to simply remove the
> "fuzzy" marker. The change *is* user visible, however. With the fuzzy
> marker, the english string is shown, without the translated (German)
> one. 

Except that the English and the translated strings are exactly the same
in that case.

Regards,
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: