Re: Propose requiring Python 3.4 or later for building glibc.
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>, Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>
- Cc: debian-glibc@lists.debian.org, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>, "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>, Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Adam Conrad <adconrad@ubuntu.com>, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, Daniel Schepler <schepler@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Propose requiring Python 3.4 or later for building glibc.
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:48:43 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1bd4bfb3-cfb0-392b-1465-396d37a6e485@redhat.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.21.1810241741410.4633@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
- References: <258837a9-50bf-d2b3-950a-c28e5b411e8f@redhat.com> <[🔎] 20181022095125.GA15764@aurel32.net> <[🔎] 20181022141525.GA16023@alf.mars> <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.21.1810241650040.4633@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.21.1810241741410.4633@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
On 10/24/18 1:43 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2018, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel Schepler is working on a native bootstrap approach. As far as I
>>> understand, he natively bootstraps Debian from non-Debian (same
>>> processor architecure and kernel). I expect that his work will be
>>> impacted by the proposed change. I've added him to Cc to let him speak
>>> up.
>>
>> Daniel, any comments? I believe we have all the other distribution
>> responses required for reaching consensus on this issue.
>
> My attention has been drawn to a reply at
> <https://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2018/10/msg00059.html> that didn't
> go to libc-alpha.
>
> Carlos, do you agree we have consensus on the Python 3.4 requirement (the
> patch <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-10/msg00215.html> to add
> that requirement still needs to be reviewed)?
I agree we have consensus and that the distribution maintainer are
sufficiently aware of the change that they will have time to adjust
before the release on February 1st.
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
Reply to: