[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#583088: error generating locales es_ES, syntax errors, no definition categorys



On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:31:57PM +0200, Iker Salmón San Millán wrote:
> El 26 de mayo de 2010 21:10, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> escribió:
> 
> >
> >
> > Actually it may come from new dpkg features. Do you know which version
> > of dpkg was installed at the time of the problem?
> >
> > --
> > Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
> > aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net
> >
> 
> 
> Yes,
> dpkg version:  1.15.7.1
> 
> I think it may be an isolated error, my sister's and my girlfriend's
> computers have the same instalation[1] with the same apt-policy and after I
> rebooted my system and corrected the error I upgraded their computer and the
> problem did not appear in any case.
> 
> If you are interested in it i can try to downgrade locales package and try
> the upgrade again to see what happen.  I don't have the old package in
> /var/cache, but I've readed that there is now kind of archive with all
> versions of packages and I could find it.  But if no one else has reported
> this ...  anyway,  if I can help debbugind the problem just ask me, this is
> the only way I can colaborate with debian project rigth now and I really
> want to (colaborate).

You can try, (the old package should still be on snapshot.debian.org),
but I really doubt you will be able to reproduce it.

I have discussed with the dpkg developers, providing them the info you
gave me, but it seems very unlikely to be a problem there. In the worst
case scenario, the files would still contains the old content, which 
should have been identical (and thus not buggy).

It is most probably a bug in the kernel, I encourage you to upgrade to
your kernel to the latest version in sid, especially if you are using an
SSD, as it contains a few ext4 fixes.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net



Reply to: