On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:58:23AM +0300, Sami Liedes wrote: > Hi, > > Anything new about this bug? Not on my end. > I think I could help with this, either the reverse engineering or > reimplementation effort, if that's needed. I don't have very much > experience with RPC though. Due to school and just life in general, I have had almost no time to reverse-engineer the code. I got through only a handful of functions. So if you'd like to do this, please do. I might be able to help to some extent; in that case, please let me know (by CC'ing me). I don't think you really need that much experience with RPC. All you need to do is describe what each external function does. Basically, document how each function manipulates input, output, and global state. That's it. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 713 440 7475 | http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature