Bug#435382: libc6: ld-linux.so segfault.

[Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com>]

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:

> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:25:23PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
>> >> 4. Probably ld-linux.so itself should not segfault no matter what.
>
>> Thank you very much for clarification. Yes, I did it wrong, and now the
>> program does start, but the (4) above holds, right? Therefore I still
>> think it's a bug in ld-linux.so, even though not an important one for me
>> anymore.
>
> No, I don't think (4) holds.  This is one of the most performance
> critical programs on a Linux system; it assumes that the input files
> are somewhat valid.

Well, your answer suggests there are other programs that are allowed to
segfault. Is there a list of them so that I won't repeat mistake
reporting their segfaults as bugs in the future? ;)

-- 
Sergei.