Bug#435382: libc6: ld-linux.so segfault.

To: 435382@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#435382: libc6: ld-linux.so segfault.
From: Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:49:30 +0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 87k5sgadjp.fsf_-_@javad.com>
Reply-to: Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com>, 435382@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <handler.435382.D435382.118588357113189.notifdone@bugs.debian.org> (Debian Bug Tracking System's message of "Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:09:04 +0000")
References: <20070731120609.GA18208@artemis.corp> <[🔎] E1IFpQd-0001W8-HG@osv> <handler.435382.D435382.118588357113189.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>

I don't believe it's OK to close this bug due to the following reasons:

1. It does work with /usr/lib/debug version of gtk-1.2 libraries (when
   application is linked against gtk-1.2 instead of gtk-2.0).

2. It does work with /usr/lib/debug version of libc6 libraries.

3. Package description of libgtk2.0-0-dbg (2.8.20-7) suggests using
   LD_LIBRARY_PATH:

     "... The libraries are installed in /usr/lib/debug and can be used by
      placing that directory in LD_LIBRARY_PATH. ..."

4. Probably ld-linux.so itself should not segfault no matter what.

-- 
Sergei.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#435382: libc6: ld-linux.so segfault.
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>

References:
- Bug#435382: libc6: ld-linux.so segfault.
  - From: Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#435382: marked as done (libc6: ld-linux.so segfault.)
Next by Date: [SRM, VOLATILE] Update of tzdata in Etch
Previous by thread: Bug#435382: marked as done (libc6: ld-linux.so segfault.)
Next by thread: Bug#435382: libc6: ld-linux.so segfault.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread