On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:21:52PM +0200, johfel@gmx.de wrote:
> Am Samstag, 14. April 2007 18:46 schrieben Sie:
> > > Here are the listing of /lib/tls:
> > >
> > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 88904 2005-05-10 22:01 ld-2.3.2.so
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2006-07-14 00:59 ld-linux.so.2 ->
> > > ld-2.3.2.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9324 2005-05-10 22:01
> > > libanl-2.3.2.so
> >
> > Which version of libc6 was installed before you attempted upgrading to
> > 2.5-1? Do/did you have libc6-i686 installed?
>
> As far as I know the latest version in sid before 2.5-1 was installed.
> (perhaps 2.3.6.ds1-13 ?)
> I did not install libc6-i686.
The point is that your system has very akward things, as what lies in
your /lib/tls:
* _seems_ to come from a libc 2.3.2;
* still has a libc-2.3.6.so too that has not the correct permissions
_BUT_ the same size and date as the libc-2.3.2.so (which is
completely absurd).
* sizes that are unrecorded in known debian packages.
So we're really wondering what has been happening on that system. Did
you installed ubuntu packages at some point ? did you do anything
peculiar to your system ? do you use prelink ? well, any kind of
additionnal informations would be really apprecited.
Oh and which kernel did you had _before_ the glibc2.5 upgrade ? a 2.6
? or still a 2.4 ?
Cheers,
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@debian.org
OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpPTVYBE0I_t.pgp
Description: PGP signature