Re: glibc 2.3.6 or 2.4 in etch?
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 05:44:45PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:38:54PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > Roland McGrath wrote in
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-03/msg00122.html
> > I added a couple of things to glibc-2.4, which is now available
> > and will be seen on new systems like Fedora Core 5 next week.
> >
> > It is very likely that users will start complaining soon if we
> > are still shipping glibc 2.3.6 in etch. Is there any reason
> > not to switch to 2.4?
>
> No, we should do so. LinuxThreads and some arches are not ready
> yet, but I'm sure we can do it in time.
Great. We also have to move the reference manual into non-free.
I made some preliminary work on this issue, and it almost runs
fine here. Can I put this new glibc-doc-nonfree package into
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-glibc/glibc-doc-nonfree/
? Or should it go elsewhere?
Denis
Reply to: