Re: glibc 2.3.6 or 2.4 in etch?
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:38:54PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> Roland McGrath wrote in
> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-03/msg00122.html
> I added a couple of things to glibc-2.4, which is now available
> and will be seen on new systems like Fedora Core 5 next week.
>
> It is very likely that users will start complaining soon if we
> are still shipping glibc 2.3.6 in etch. Is there any reason
> not to switch to 2.4?
No, we should do so. LinuxThreads and some arches are not ready
yet, but I'm sure we can do it in time.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
Reply to: