[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#242490: marked as done (linux-kernel-headers: Protect Linux headers from unproper inclussion)



Your message dated Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:12:54 +0900
with message-id <87fyu7scl5.wl%gotom@debian.or.jp>
and subject line Bug#242490: linux-kernel-headers: Protect Linux headers from unproper inclussion
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 23:56:53 +0000
>From rmh@khazad.dyndns.org Tue Apr 06 16:56:53 2004
Return-path: <rmh@khazad.dyndns.org>
Received: from 86.red-80-24-13.pooles.rima-tde.net (aragorn) [80.24.13.86] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BB0Qx-0003Ah-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 16:56:50 -0700
Received: from rmh by aragorn with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BAydw-0001e3-00; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:02:04 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0623077800=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: linux-kernel-headers: Protect Linux headers from unproper inclussion
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:02:02 +0200
Message-Id: <E1BAydw-0001e3-00@aragorn>
Sender: <rmh@khazad.dyndns.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===============0623077800==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Hi!

The attached script implements a warning in Linux headers to prevent that
userland applications include them directly.

Patching Glibc cannot be easily automated and requires a long, but boring
task. I'll send the corresponding changes for Glibc when this patch script
is confirmed.

This may cause some breakage, so not to be applied before Sarge release..

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

-- no debconf information

--===============0623077800==
Content-Type: application/x-shellscript
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="linux_protect.sh"
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--===============0623077800==--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 242490-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2005 04:12:38 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Thu Jul 21 21:12:38 2005
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from megaela.srvf.org [210.251.64.91] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1Dvotp-0001Tb-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 21:12:38 -0700
Received: (qmail 7261 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2005 04:12:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rhodes.gotom.jp) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jul 2005 04:12:32 -0000
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:12:54 +0900
Message-ID: <87fyu7scl5.wl%gotom@debian.or.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: 242490-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#242490: linux-kernel-headers: Protect Linux headers from unproper inclussion
In-Reply-To: <20040407204802.GA17718@khazad.dyndns.org>
References: <E1BAydw-0001e3-00@aragorn>
	<20040407045248.GA2309@nevyn.them.org>
	<20040407100549.GA11520@khazad.dyndns.org>
	<20040407131836.GA13243@nevyn.them.org>
	<20040407121042.GA15791@khazad.dyndns.org>
	<20040407212406.GA5160@nevyn.them.org>
	<20040407204802.GA17718@khazad.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7
 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i386-pc-linux-gnu)
 MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 242490-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

At Wed, 7 Apr 2004 22:48:02 +0200,
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 05:24:06PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > 
> > > Oh, I understand. But this only addresses part of the problem (breaking
> > > portability between different versions of Linux), not the other part
> > > (breaking portability between different kernels). Gratiutously including
> > > Linux headers from userspace is still wrong for most apps.
> > > 
> > > Do you have any plans for fixing that?
> > 
> > No.  I don't see a need for a plan, either.  I don't want to make
> > people jump through hoops to write code which uses the Linux kernel
> > headers and I doubt you will find anyone else who wants to, either.
> 
> I'm not jumping through hoops either.

I think it's time to close this bug rathar than to keep opening.  If
you plan to fix it, please let me know.  However it's a hard task, and
the submitter does not have any intension to fix lkh seen from the
last mail, so I close this bug.  If you disagree with this closing, I
hope you put another (probably a lot of) patches to lkh.

Regards,
-- gotom



Reply to: