Re: Using SVN instead?
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 08:24:39PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > I prefer svn over arch because svn seems to work close enough to cvs
> > that I don't need to spend much time learning it. I also think that the
> > upstream author of arch is an ass, but that should really be only a very
> > minor consideration. =)
>
> I found I had almost zero trouble switching from cvs to svn (oh, except that
> mysteriously I have to run 'svn up' before committing slightly more often
> than I had to run 'cvs up' before commiting, but it's really fast, so I
> don't mind).
This should dispel the mystery:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/svnbook/apas02.html
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: