[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#274738: on mips{,el} atexit.o should be compiled with -mxgot



reassign 274738 binutils
severity 274738 important
thanks

At Tue, 05 Oct 2004 10:04:20 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Mon, 4 Oct 2004 00:25:00 +0200,
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > current mainline libgcj fails to build on mips{,el}:
> > > 
> > > /home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/gcc/ -nostdinc++ -L/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/mipsel-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src -L/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/mipsel-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/mipsel-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/mipsel-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/mipsel-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/mipsel-linux-gnu/sys-include -shared -nostdlib /usr/lib/crti.o /home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/gcc/crtbeginS.o .libs/libgcj.la-2.o -Wl,--whole-archive ../libffi/.libs/libffi_convenience.a ../boehm-gc/.libs/libgcjgc_convenience.a ./libltdl/.libs/libltdlc.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive  -L/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/mipsel-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src -L/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/mipsel-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/mipsel-linux
 -g
>  nu/libjava ../libffi/.libs/libffi_convenience.a ../boehm-gc/.libs/libgcjgc_convenience.a -lpthread ./libltdl/.libs/libltdlc.a -ldl -lz -L/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/gcc -lgcc_s -lc -lgcc_s    /home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/gcc/crtendS.o /usr/lib/crtn.o  -Wl,-soname -Wl,libgcj.so.6 -o .libs/libgcj.so.6.0.0
> > > /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(atexit.oS)(.text+0x38): In function `atexit':
> > > : relocation truncated to fit: R_MIPS_CALL16 __cxa_atexit@@GLIBC_2.2
> > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > > make[2]: *** [libgcj.la] Error 1
> > > 
> > > can be fixed by compiling glibc's atexit with -mxgot
> >
> > This needs _two_ sets of those objects then, because a link employing
> > multigot will silently break over xgot objects.
> 
> Does this problem come from glibc's compilation problem?
> 
> > > (at least that's the way mozilla succeeded to build).
> > 
> > Actually, no, mozilla uses the standard gcc/libc objects. It believe it
> > happens to work because those objects are linked in earlier, so their
> > GOT entry offset doesn't exceed the limit.
> 
> Do you know what's the actual problem?

This is my memorandum, and the summary.  If you find mistake, please
follow up it.

	mips/mipsel has long-standing problem about GOT handling.  The
	GOT size is limited to 16KB and it's sometimes small.  This
	report is affected by this problem.

	There're two ways to fix this problem; multiGOT and XGOT.
	XGOT is originally developed in IRIX.  It uses 32bit GOT, so
	we don't need to worry about overflow of the table size.
	Matthias suggested to use -mxgot.  However, unfortunatelly, we
	may lose binary compatibility (said by Thiemo).  Thiemo said
	it's nicer than multiGOT.  OTOH, multiGOT is to have multiple
	GOT - Daniel suggested it.  He said binutils should be fixed
	if it does not work.  Note that multiGOT is firstly supported
	by Alexandre Oliva in binutils 2.15 development.

In debian-mips, there were discussions about gcj compilation problem.
David Daney replied to Matthias that the current binutils + glibc
should work without any GOT problems:

	http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2004/10/msg00008.html

I don't know which technically correct is.  However, it's
long-standing problem, and not glibc problem.  This bug should
actually be considered, but it's not sarge's target.  I downgrade it
to important and reassign it to binutils.  If you have another
opinion, let us know.

Regards,
-- gotom



Reply to: