[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#274738: on mips{,el} atexit.o should be compiled with -mxgot



At Mon, 4 Oct 2004 00:25:00 +0200,
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > current mainline libgcj fails to build on mips{,el}:
> > 
> > /home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/gcc/ -nostdinc++ -L/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/mipsel-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src -L/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/mipsel-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/mipsel-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/mipsel-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/mipsel-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/mipsel-linux-gnu/sys-include -shared -nostdlib /usr/lib/crti.o /home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/gcc/crtbeginS.o .libs/libgcj.la-2.o -Wl,--whole-archive ../libffi/.libs/libffi_convenience.a ../boehm-gc/.libs/libgcjgc_convenience.a ./libltdl/.libs/libltdlc.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive  -L/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/mipsel-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src -L/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/mipsel-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/mipsel-linux-g
 nu/libjava ../libffi/.libs/libffi_convenience.a ../boehm-gc/.libs/libgcjgc_convenience.a -lpthread ./libltdl/.libs/libltdlc.a -ldl -lz -L/home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/gcc -lgcc_s -lc -lgcc_s    /home/doko/gcc/gcc-snapshot-20041003/build/gcc/crtendS.o /usr/lib/crtn.o  -Wl,-soname -Wl,libgcj.so.6 -o .libs/libgcj.so.6.0.0
> > /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(atexit.oS)(.text+0x38): In function `atexit':
> > : relocation truncated to fit: R_MIPS_CALL16 __cxa_atexit@@GLIBC_2.2
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[2]: *** [libgcj.la] Error 1
> > 
> > can be fixed by compiling glibc's atexit with -mxgot
>
> This needs _two_ sets of those objects then, because a link employing
> multigot will silently break over xgot objects.

Does this problem come from glibc's compilation problem?

> > (at least that's the way mozilla succeeded to build).
> 
> Actually, no, mozilla uses the standard gcc/libc objects. It believe it
> happens to work because those objects are linked in earlier, so their
> GOT entry offset doesn't exceed the limit.

Do you know what's the actual problem?

Regards,
-- gotom



Reply to: