Re: TLS-version of libc6/{testing,unstable} breaks libunwind
At Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:26:37 -0700,
David Mosberger wrote:
> GOTO> I prepared 2.3.2.ds1-16_ia64 compiling without
> GOTO> -fomit-frame-pointer. It's added by debian/sysdeps/linux.mk.
> GOTO> I put that version at:
>
> GOTO> http://www.gotom.jp/~gotom/debian/debian/glibc/2.3.2.ds1-16_ia64.fofp/
>
> GOTO> David, could you check it? Unfortunatelly I have no
> GOTO> permission to access chroot on ia64 to test this kind of
> GOTO> problems.
>
> Thanks, but why ia64? My bug-report was for i386. There is no issue
> for ia64 (where omit-frame-pointer is a no-op).
Oops. I didn't confirm which architecture was used. Plus I should
know ia64 frame structure, too.
> GOTO> I think it's good idea to drop -fomit-frame-pointer from
> GOTO> linux.mk for building libc with NPTL. If such optimization
> GOTO> option is fine for specific architecture, it should be defined
> GOTO> -fomit-frame-pointer in debian/sysdeps/*.mk.
>
> Does this mean you plan on rebuilding the i386 glibc without
> -fomit-frame-pointer? That would be fine with me.
Yes, if it makes problem, and if it does not cause siginificant
performance drop, I think it should be modified.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: