[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#162651: marked as done (libc6: Possible interaction with libtrash)



Your message dated Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:04:53 +0900
with message-id <81vfg88n22.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
and subject line Bug#162651: libc6: Possible interaction with libtrash
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2002 00:38:12 +0000
>From mfedyk@matchmail.com Fri Sep 27 19:38:12 2002
Return-path: <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net (mmp-linux.matchmail.com) [63.194.239.202] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17v5ca-0006ca-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:38:12 -0500
Received: from [10.0.0.122] (helo=mis-mike-wstn)
	by mmp-linux.matchmail.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17v5c5-0004ug-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:37:41 -0700
Received: from mfedyk by mis-mike-wstn with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17v5c4-000440-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:37:40 -0700
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6: Possible interaction with libtrash
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:37:40 -0700
Message-Id: <E17v5c4-000440-00@mis-mike-wstn>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-14.3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hi,

I have just reported a wishlist bug[1] against libtrash requesting a new
version to be packaged.  But, according to the libtrash page[2], there might
be an interaction with libc6 2.2.5 and libtrash.  This[3] patch is supposed
to fix the problem, and has a small discussion[4] on bug-glibc.

Thanks,

Mike

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=162641&repeatmerged=yes

[2] http://m-arriaga.net/software/libtrash/

[3] http://www.m-arriaga.net/software/libtrash/patch-glibc-2.2.5.diff

--- libc/elf/do-lookup.h	2001/08/26 22:24:08	1.16
+++ libc/elf/do-lookup.h	2002/04/03 04:03:39	1.16.2.1
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@
 	  if (verstab != NULL)
 	    {
 	      ElfW(Half) ndx = verstab[symidx] & 0x7fff;
-	      if (ndx > 2) /* map->l_versions[ndx].hash != 0) */
+	      if (ndx >= 2) /* map->l_versions[ndx].hash != 0) */
 		{
 		  /* Don't accept hidden symbols.  */
 		  if ((verstab[symidx] & 0x8000) == 0 && num_versions++ == 0)

[4] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-glibc/2002-04/msg00025.html

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mis-mike-wstn 2.4.19 #1 SMP Thu Aug 29 11:35:43 PDT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat                 2.1.3-4    The Berkeley database routines [gl


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 162651-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2004 10:04:55 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Wed Jul 28 03:04:55 2004
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BplIt-0007RJ-00; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:04:55 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D238ADEB58; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:04:53 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:04:53 +0900
Message-ID: <81vfg88n22.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>, 162651-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#162651: libc6: Possible interaction with libtrash
In-Reply-To: <E17v5c4-000440-00@mis-mike-wstn>
References: <E17v5c4-000440-00@mis-mike-wstn>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 162651-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:37:40 -0700,
Mike Fedyk wrote:
> I have just reported a wishlist bug[1] against libtrash requesting a new
> version to be packaged.  But, according to the libtrash page[2], there might
> be an interaction with libc6 2.2.5 and libtrash.  This[3] patch is supposed
> to fix the problem, and has a small discussion[4] on bug-glibc.

This bug should be fixed in the latest glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 because the
source code is modified to something similar things.  So I close this
bug.  But if you find this bug is still alive, please reopen and
complain it.

Regards,
-- gotom



Reply to: