On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:49:51PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:56:01AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > > (3) make libnss-udeb which includes libnss-dns and libnss-files. > > I think option (3) is probably the best. NACK, it will break our i386 floppies. > I don't mind whether you produce libnss-udeb or two separate > libnss-*-udeb packages: although check that nothing depends on the > existing libnss-dns-udeb (if so, a provides will be needed), and you'll > probably break d-i daily builds for a couple of days if you drop > libnss-dns-udeb now. > > If you go for (3) I think you should still do (1) as well: at least, > that's the current arrangement with libnss_dns. Option 3 is not possible. Look at the free space on the i386 floppies. Bastian -- Where there's no emotion, there's no motive for violence. -- Spock, "Dagger of the Mind", stardate 2715.1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature